Blog

这篇文章以清华简〈廼命〉与〈祷辞〉为核心材料，将它们重新理解为楚国贵族的“管理双文档系统”：〈廼命〉像一份战国版的内控手册，负责遏制内耗、反腐败、阻断掮客网络，确保组织拥有稳定的底盘；〈祷辞〉则像一份递交给祖先的战略路演稿，通过展示投入、提出量化KPI、描绘百川归海式的宏大愿景，为组织争取资源与增长空间。两篇竹简共同揭示了楚人如何在制度与野心之间找到平衡——用最稳的规矩守住下限，用最大的目标拉高上限，让一个家族、一个组织、甚至一座文明，都能同时具备“专精特新”的增长飞轮。This article examines the Tsinghua bamboo texts Nai Ming and Dao Ci as a dual-management system used by Chu aristocratic clans. Nai Ming functions as an ancient internal-control manual that prevents organizational decay—curbing corruption, stopping rent-seeking, and keeping information flow aligned. Dao Ci acts as a strategic pitch to the ancestral board, showcasing prior investments, laying out quantifiable KPIs, and articulating a macro-vision as vast as “rivers returning to the sea.” Together, these two documents reveal how the Chu elite balanced discipline with ambition: stabilizing the lower boundary with rules, and expanding the upper boundary with vision, forming an early version of a “specialized-innovative growth flywheel.”

本篇《清华简〈五纪〉》重新解读《五纪》这部以日、月、星、辰、岁为核心的竹简，将其视为一幅“文明生命体”的生理地图。在楚人的世界观中，星辰为骨，江河生血，德行如五官五脏，时间的运转即是生命的呼吸。《五纪》展现了一种以节律为法、以天文为身的文明观——时间不再抽象，而成为能呼吸、能自我修复的生命。Tsinghua University Collection of Warring States Bamboo Slips “Wu Ji” (“Five Cycles”) — “Stars as Bones, Rivers as Blood.”This essay reinterprets Wu Ji as a physiological map of civilization. The five cycles—Sun, Moon, Stars, Constellations, and Years—are not astronomical observations but the rhythm of life itself. In this text, stars become bones, rivers flow as blood, and virtue acts as the organs that sustain order. Wu Ji reveals how the Chu imagined time as a living body—breathing, circulating, and forever returning to balance.

《上博六：〈庄王既成〉｜竹简里的霸总焦虑：楚庄王和他的终极KPI》
以“后之人，几何保之”的问句为核心，重新解读楚庄王在春秋盛世中的远虑与清醒。
本文通过楚庄王与沈尹子茎的简短问答，揭示出一种将不确定性转化为治理策略的古代思维：
从“模糊的预警”到“路径的推演”，庄王在功成之际反思未来，
将政治焦虑升华为制度韧性与文明自觉。
这是一份写给时间的绩效评估——也是对“盛世危言”在中国政治文化中反复回响的再度倾听。
Shanghai Museum Chu Bamboo Slip “King Zhuang Already Completed” (“Zhuang Wang Ji Cheng”) — The CEO Anxiety on Bamboo Slips: King Zhuang of Chu and His Ultimate KPI explores how a Spring and Autumn monarch turned success into foresight. Through a short dialogue—“How many generations can keep it?” / “Between the fourth and the fifth”—the essay reveals an ancient leadership mindset that transforms uncertainty into strategy. Reading the bamboo slips as a performance report written to time itself, it shows how King Zhuang’s “question of succession” became a reflection on sustainability, risk management, and the limits of control. His anxiety is not weakness but awareness—the moment when a ruler learns to manage the future rather than merely rule the present.

《上博简：昭王与龔之脽 & 昭王毀室｜楚昭王在制度与人情间的平衡术》是一篇基于上博楚简两篇文本的历史-管理学双重解读。文章从楚昭王两次看似“违规”的决策——赐袍与毁室——出发，揭示他如何在“常古”（制度原则）与“权变”（人情变通）之间找到动态平衡。文中通过竹简原文的精确引用，展示昭王先以“使邦人皆见之”公开化恩赏，再以“既落焉从尃”在礼与孝冲突中重排优先级；他既不僵化守制，也不逾矩徇情，而是以理性温度守护楚国的制度根魂。本文旨在为当代治理与企业管理提供启示：真正的领导力，不在于死守规则或恣意破例，而在于理解规则背后的精神，在原则中保留温度，在秩序中容纳人心。Shanghai Museum Chu Slips: “King Zhao and Gong Zhui” & “King Zhao Destroys the Chamber — Balancing Law and Human Feeling in Chu Governance” re-examines two bamboo-slip records of King Zhao of Chu to reveal a leadership philosophy of balance between institutional integrity (chang gu, “the constant ancients”) and flexible adaptation (quan bian, responsive change). From the “Robe Episode,” in which the king turns a potential lapse in protocol into a public affirmation of moral order (“so that all the people may see it”), to the “Destroyed Chamber” judgment that reconciles ritual form with filial duty (“perform the completion rite, then dismantle”), King Zhao embodies a rational warmth that preserves the core of law while humanizing its application. The essay argues that sustainable leadership—ancient or modern—requires knowing the hierarchy of rules, keeping transparency in exceptions, and protecting the moral foundations that give any system its enduring life.

在两册上博简中，《灵王遂申》（上博九）与《申公臣灵王》（上博六）分别记录了楚国霸业的两种运行逻辑：一篇在外——以掠夺构筑“共犯同盟”；一篇在内——以机锋化解“宫廷危局”。《灵王遂申》揭露了霸主如何命令附庸国“室出取器”，以制度化的分赃完成集体绑架；《申公臣灵王》则展现陈公如何以言辞为刃，在楚王的试探与权谋中化险为夷。两篇竹简隔册而呼应，形成一部楚式“权力学原典”：当力量成为唯一的秩序，智慧，便是唯一的生存。In two volumes of the Shanghai Museum bamboo manuscripts, Ling Wang Sui Shen (Vol. 9) and Shen Gong Chen Ling Wang (Vol. 6) record two distinct logics of Chu hegemony: one outward—building a “coalition of accomplices” through orchestrated plunder; the other inward—resolving palace crises through verbal finesse and political intelligence. Ling Wang Sui Shen exposes how the hegemon commanded vassal states to “send out each household to take spoils,” turning shared crime into institutional loyalty. Shen Gong Chen Ling Wang reveals how Lord Chen used language as his blade, turning the king’s tests and suspicion into an occasion for survival. Together they form an archetype of the “Chu-style order of power”: when might becomes the only order, wisdom becomes the only way to live.

在距今两千六百多年前的楚国，一场“招聘面试”决定了国家的命运。这篇出自上海博物馆藏战国楚简第九册的《成王為城濮之行》，记录了楚成王出征前选将的全过程：
一位是高压执行的“绩效狂人”，一位是宽柔治军的“团队教练”。成王看清了人性，却依然做出错误的选择。这场古代的“人事决策”，预言了城濮之败，也折射出千年未解的管理难题——制度与人性，理性与柔性，KPI与OKR，究竟谁能带领团队穿越险境？
在竹简的光影之间，我们听见的不只是战争的前奏，更是文明对“判断”的试炼。Over 2,600 years ago in the State of Chu, a recruitment interview determined the fate of an empire. The bamboo manuscript Cheng-king’s March to Chengpu (Shanghai Museum Vol. IX) records how King Cheng faced a choice before war: one commander ruled by fear and performance metrics, another by trust and rhythm. The king saw human nature clearly, yet still chose wrong. This ancient HR dilemma foretold the defeat at Chengpu—and reveals a timeless question: Between system and humanity, control and compassion, KPI and OKR, which truly sustains a civilization? In the soft gleam of bamboo slips, war becomes a mirror for judgment itself.